On 2022-08-09 Tu 16:19, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 8/9/22 4:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> On 2022-08-09 Tu 15:50, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >>> On 8/9/22 3:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > >>> >>>> OTOH, it's not a great sign this is around json again... >>> >>> Yeah, I was thinking about that too. >> >> >> Ouch :-( >> >> I think after 10 years of being involved with our JSON features, I'm >> going to take a substantial break on that front. > > I hope that wasn't taken as a sleight, but just an observation. There > are other feature areas where I can make similar observations. All > this work around a database system is challenging as there are many > considerations that need to be made. > > You've done an awesome job driving the JSON work forward and it is > greatly appreciated. > >
Thanks, I appreciate that (and I wasn't fishing for compliments). It's more that I feel a bit tired of it ... some of my colleagues will confirm that I've been saying this for a while, so it's not spurred by this setback. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
