On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 2:57 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, it took a while to figure out how to make that work, but I > believe I've got it now. Attached please find a couple of patches that > should get the job done. They might need a bit of polish, but I think > the basic concepts are sound.
So, would people like these patches (1) committed to master only, (2) committed to master and back-patched into v15, or (3) not committed at all? Michael argued upthread that it was too risky to be tinkering with things at this stage in the release cycle and, certainly, the more time goes by, the more true that gets. But I'm not convinced that these patches involve an inordinate degree of risk, and using beta as a time to fix things that turned out to be buggy is part of the point of the whole thing. On the other hand, the underlying issue isn't that serious either, and nobody seems to have reviewed the patches in detail, either. I don't mind committing them on my own recognizance if that's what people would prefer; I can take responsibility for fixing anything that is further broken, as I suppose would be expected even if someone else did review. But, I don't want to do something that other people feel is the wrong thing to have done. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
