Hi, On 2022-07-18 14:57:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > As to whether this is a good fix, I think someone could certainly > argue otherwise. This is all a bit grotty. However, I don't find it > all that bad. As long as we're moving files from between one PG > cluster and another using an external tool rather than logic inside > the server itself, I think we're bound to have some hacks someplace to > make it all work. To me, extending them to a few more places to avoid > leaving files behind on disk seems like a good trade-off. Your mileage > may vary.
How about adding a new binary_upgrade_* helper function for this purpose instead, instead of tying it into truncate? Greetings, Andres Freund
