On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 at 18:42, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > Thanks. I was looking at the recently modified REINDEX syntax and > noticed there another spot for taking an optional name. I ended up > reusing OptSchemaName for that, as in the attached patch. I think > adding production-specific additional productions is pointless and > probably bloats the grammar. So let me +1 your push of the patch you > posted, just to keep things moving forward, but in addition I propose to > later rename OptSchemaName to something more generic and use it in these > three places. >
OK, pushed. Before writing opt_stats_name, I went looking for anything else I could use, but didn't see anything. The difference between this and the index case, is that statistics objects can be schema-qualified, so it might be tricky to get something that'll work for all 3 places. Regards, Dean
