On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:16 AM Steve Chavez <st...@supabase.io> wrote: > Thanks Alexander! > > wrt to the new patch. I think the following comment is misleading since > keyDeleted can be true or false: > > + /* switch equal_match to false so we only find greater matches now */ > + node = (IntRBTreeNode *) rbt_find_great(tree, (RBTNode *) &searchNode, > + keyDeleted); > > Maybe it should be the same used for searching lesser keys: > > + /* > + * Find the next key. If the current key is deleted, we can pass > + * equal_match == true and still find the next one. > + */
Thank you for catching this. The revised version of patch is attached! ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
0001-Use-C99-designator-in-the-rbtree-sentinel-definit-v3.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-Add-missing-inequality-searches-to-rbtree-v3.patch
Description: Binary data
