Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2022-07-03 20:08:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I do still feel that HPPA is of interest, to keep us honest >> about spinlock support
> I.e. forgetting to initialize them? Or the weird alignment stuff it has? The nonzero initialization mainly, and to a lesser extent the weird size of a lock. I think the fact that the active word is only part of the lock struct is pretty well encapsulated. > I'd started to work a patch to detect missing initialization for both > spinlocks and lwlocks, I think that'd be good to have for more common cases. No objection to having more than one check for this ;-) regards, tom lane