Hi, On 2022-07-03 20:08:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I would have preferred to keep pademelon, with its pre-C99 compiler, going > until v11 is EOL, but that ain't happening.
I'm not too worried about that - clang with -std=c89 -Wc99-extensions -Werror=c99-extensions as it's running on mylodon for the older branches seems to do a decent job. And is obviously much faster :) > I would not stand in the way of dropping HP-UX and IA64 support as of > v16. Cool. > I do still feel that HPPA is of interest, to keep us honest > about spinlock support I.e. forgetting to initialize them? Or the weird alignment stuff it has? I'd started to work a patch to detect missing initialization for both spinlocks and lwlocks, I think that'd be good to have for more common cases. Greetings, Andres Freund
