On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 4:30 PM Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 7:03 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> 1015 improvements to 14 disimprovements isn't a bad score. I'm >> a bit surprised there are that many removable SubqueryScans TBH; >> maybe that's an artifact of all the "SELECT *" queries.
> The patch looks sane to me. 1015 vs 14 is a good win. +1 Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
