Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2022-Jul-18, Richard Guo wrote:
>> BTW, not related to this patch, the new lines for parallel_aware check
>> in setrefs.c are very wide. How about wrap them to keep consistent with
>> arounding codes?

> Not untrue!  Something like this, you mean?  Fixed the nearby typo while
> at it.

WFM.  (I'd fixed the comment typo in my patch, but I don't mind if
you get there first.)

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to