Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2022-Jul-18, Richard Guo wrote: >> BTW, not related to this patch, the new lines for parallel_aware check >> in setrefs.c are very wide. How about wrap them to keep consistent with >> arounding codes?
> Not untrue! Something like this, you mean? Fixed the nearby typo while > at it. WFM. (I'd fixed the comment typo in my patch, but I don't mind if you get there first.) regards, tom lane