At Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:55:48 +0900, Shinya Kato <shinya11.k...@oss.nttdata.com>
wrote in
> I understand. For backward compatibility, I left the ROLE clause
> option as it is and changed the IN ROLE clause option to --membership
> option.
Thanks!
- printf(_(" -g, --role=ROLE new role will be a member of this
role\n"));
+ printf(_(" -g, --role=ROLE new role will be a member of this
role\n"));
This looks lik an unexpected change. We shoudl preserve it, but *I*
think that we can add a synonym of the old --role for
understandability/memorability. (By the way "-g" looks like coming
from "group", which looks somewhat strange..)
> printf(_(" -b, --belongs-to=ROLE new role will be a member of this
> role\n"));
+ printf(_(" -m, --membership=ROLE this role will be a member of new
role\n"));
membership sounds somewhat obscure, it seems *to me* members is clearer
> printf(_(" -m, --member=ROLE new role will be a member of this
> role\n"));
I'd like to hear others' opinions.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
