At Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:10:01 +0900, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote in > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:46:25PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > It is sensible to rig createuser command with full capability of > > CREATE ROLE is reasonable. > > > > Only --replication is added by commit 9b8aff8c19 (2010) since > > 8ae0d476a9 (2005). BYPASSRLS and NOBYPASSRLS were introduced by > > 491c029dbc (2014) but it seems to have forgotten to add the > > corresponding createuser options. > > > > By a quick search, found a few other CREATE ROLE optinos that are not > > supported by createuser. > > My question is: is BYPASSRLS common enough to justify having a switch > to createuser? As the development cycle of 15 has just finished and > that we are in feature freeze, you may want to hold on new patches for > a bit. The next commit fest is planned for July.
I don't think there's a definitive criteria (other than feasibility) for whether each CREATE ROLE option should have the correspondent option in the createuser command. I don't see a clear reason why createuser command should not have the option. As far as schedules are concerned, I don't think this has anything to do with 15. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
