On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 7:56 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Jonathan S. Katz" <jk...@postgresql.org> writes: > > > Maybe to appeal to all crowds, we say "list configuration parameters > > (GUCs)"? > > I'm in the camp that says that GUC is not an acronym we wish to expose > to end users. > > I am too. In any case, either go all-in with GUC (i.e., \dG or \dguc) or pretend it doesn't exist - an in-between position is unappealing.
David J.
