"Jonathan S. Katz" <jk...@postgresql.org> writes:
> I am a bit torn between "\dcp" (or \dsetting / \dconfig? we don't
> necessarily need for it to be super short) and "\sc". Certainly with
> pattern matching the interface for the "\d" commands would fit that
> pattern. "\sc" would make sense for a thorough introspection of what is
> in the GUC. That said, we get that with SHOW today.
> So I'm leaning towards something in the "\d" family.
I agree that \d-something makes the most sense from a functionality
standpoint. But I don't want to make the name too long, even if we
do have tab completion to help.
\dconf maybe?
regards, tom lane
