Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-03-28 08:28:29 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> I am not sure if for 14 we can make a catalog change as that would
>> require catversion bump, so adding a code-level check as suggested by
>> Andres seems like a better option. Andres/Tom, any better ideas for
>> this?
> I think we could do the catalog change too, so that future initdb's are marked
> correctly. But we obviously do need the code-level check nevertheless.
Yeah. We have to install the C-level check, so I don't see any
point in changing the catalogs in back branches. That'll create
confusion while not saving anything.
regards, tom lane
