Tatsuo Ishii <is...@sraoss.co.jp> writes:
> Thanks. Patch pushed.
This patch has caused the PDF documentation to fail to build cleanly:
[WARN] FOUserAgent - The contents of fo:block line 1 exceed the available area
in the inline-progression direction by more than 50 points. (See position
125066:375)
It's complaining about this:
<synopsis>
<replaceable>interval_start</replaceable>
<replaceable>num_transactions</replaceable>
<replaceable>sum_latency</replaceable> <replaceable>sum_latency_2</replaceable>
<replaceable>min_latency</replaceable> <replaceable>max_latency</replaceable> {
<replaceable>failures</replaceable> |
<replaceable>serialization_failures</replaceable>
<replaceable>deadlock_failures</replaceable> } <optional>
<replaceable>sum_lag</replaceable> <replaceable>sum_lag_2</replaceable>
<replaceable>min_lag</replaceable> <replaceable>max_lag</replaceable>
<optional> <replaceable>skipped</replaceable> </optional> </optional>
<optional> <replaceable>retried</replaceable>
<replaceable>retries</replaceable> </optional>
</synopsis>
which runs much too wide in HTML format too, even though that toolchain
doesn't tell you so.
We could silence the warning by inserting an arbitrary line break or two,
or refactoring the syntax description into multiple parts. Either way
seems to create a risk of confusion.
TBH, I think the *real* problem is that the complexity of this log format
has blown past "out of hand". Can't we simplify it? Who is really going
to use all these numbers? I pity the poor sucker who tries to write a
log analysis tool that will handle all the variants.
regards, tom lane
