On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 3:35 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> So I'm not sure how much can be gleaned from raw "failure counts" without
> taking the number of runs into account as well?
Ah, right, it does indeed hold the record for most runs in 3 months,
and taking runs into account its "stats" failure rate is clustered
with mandrill and seawasp. Anyway, clearly not relevant because
dragonet doesn't even show up in the list.
animal | runs | stats_test_fail_fraction
---------------+------+--------------------------
mandrill | 158 | 0.0126582278481013
seawasp | 85 | 0.0117647058823529
serinus | 1299 | 0.0107775211701309
sungazer | 174 | 0.00574712643678161
flaviventris | 1292 | 0.00464396284829721
bonito | 313 | 0.00319488817891374
crake | 743 | 0.00134589502018843
