> On 20 Feb 2022, at 02:38, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Back to this patch: assuming we can settle on a good-enough-for-now > replacement algorithm, do we want to add this set of 7 GUCs? Does > anyone else want to weigh in on that? Hi Thomas! It seems we don't have any other input besides reviews and Andres's -0.2. Is there a chance to proceed? Best regards, Andrey Borodin.