On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:16 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think the best way is to do some refactoring and renaming of the > function, because as part of HeapDetermineModifiedColumns we are > already processing the tuple so we can not put extra overhead of > reprocessing it again. In short I like the idea of renaming the > HeapDetermineModifiedColumns and moving part of heap_tuple_attr_equals > code into the caller. Here is the patch set for the same. I have > divided it into two patches which can eventually be merged, 0001- for > refactoring 0002- does the actual work. >
+ /*
+ * If it's a whole-tuple reference, say "not equal". It's not really
+ * worth supporting this case, since it could only succeed after a
+ * no-op update, which is hardly a case worth optimizing for.
+ */
+ if (attrnum == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * Likewise, automatically say "not equal" for any system attribute
+ * other than tableOID; we cannot expect these to be consistent in a
+ * HOT chain, or even to be set correctly yet in the new tuple.
+ */
+ if (attrnum < 0)
+ {
+ if (attrnum != TableOidAttributeNumber)
+ continue;
+ }
These two cases need to be considered as the corresponding attribute
is modified, so the attnum needs to be added in the bitmapset of
modified attrs.
I have changed this and various other comments in the patch. I have
modified the docs as well to reflect the changes. I thought of adding
a test but I think the current test in toast.sql seems sufficient.
Kindly let me know what you think of the attached? I think we should
backpatch this till v10. What do you think?
Does anyone else have better ideas to fix this?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
v6-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-at.patch
Description: Binary data
