On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 9:34 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 12:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Attached please find the modified patches. > > > > I have looked into the latest modification and back branch patches and > > they look fine to me. > > > > Today, while looking at this patch again, I think I see one problem > with the below change (referring pg10 patch): > + if (attrnum < 0) > + { > + if (attrnum != ObjectIdAttributeNumber && > + attrnum != TableOidAttributeNumber) > + { > + modified = bms_add_member(modified, > + attrnum - > + FirstLowInvalidHeapAttributeNumber); > + continue; > + } > + } > ... > ... > + /* No need to check attributes that can't be stored externally. */ > + if (isnull1 || TupleDescAttr(tupdesc, attrnum - 1)->attlen != -1) > + continue; > > I think it is possible that we use TupleDescAttr for system attribute > (in this case ObjectIdAttributeNumber/TableOidAttributeNumber) which > will be wrong as it contains only user attributes, not system > attributes. See comments atop TupleDescData. > > I think this check should be modified to if (attrnum < 0 || isnull1 > || TupleDescAttr(tupdesc, attrnum - 1)->attlen != -1). What do you > think? >
I agree with you. > * Another minor comment: > + if (!heap_attr_equals(RelationGetDescr(relation), attrnum, value1, > + value2, isnull1, isnull2)) > > I think here we can directly use tupdesc instead of > RelationGetDescr(relation). > +1. Attached the patches which fixed the above two comments and the first comment in my previous mail [1], the rest is the same as before. I ran the tests on all branches, they all passed as expected. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS0PR01MB61134DD41BE6D986B9DB80CCFB2E9%40OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com Regards, Tang
13-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch
Description: 13-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch
14-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch
Description: 14-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch
HEAD-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-at.patch
Description: HEAD-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-at.patch
10-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch
Description: 10-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch
11-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch
Description: 11-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch
12-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch
Description: 12-v9-0001-WAL-log-unchanged-toasted-replica-identity-key-.patch