On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 5:34 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 24.01.22 19:53, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 3:41 AM Peter Eisentraut > > <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Rebased patch set > > > > What if someone finds this new behavior too permissive? > > Which part exactly? There are several different changes proposed here.
I was just going based on the description of the feature in your original post. If someone is hoping that int4in() will accept only ^\d+$ then they will be disappointed by this patch. Maybe nobody is hoping that, though. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
