Hi, On 2022-01-18 18:31:42 -0500, James Coleman wrote: > One other question on this: if we went with this would you expect a > new function to parallel pg_last_committed_xact()?
I don't think I have an opinion the user interface aspect. > Or allow the xid and lsn in the return of pg_last_committed_xact() > potentially not to match (of course xid might also not be present if > track_commit_timestamps isn't on)? Or would you expect the current xid and > timestamp use the new infrastructure also? When you say "current xid", what do you mean? I think it might make sense to use the new approach for all of these. Greetings, Andres Freund
