On 2022-Jan-17, James Coleman wrote: > I'd be happy to make it a separate GUC, though it seems adding an > additional atomic access is worse (assuming we can convince ourselves > putting this into the commit timestamps infrastructure is acceptable) > given here we're already under a lock.
I was thinking it'd not be under any locks ... and I don't think it belongs under commit timestamps either. -- Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings (indeed, all arrays), for surely where thou typest "foo" someone someday shall type "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" (5th Commandment for C programmers)
