On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It looks good to me. The only real objection would be if someone came > up with a test case proving that there's a significant performance > degradation from the extra copies. But given that these are back > branches, it would take a pretty steep penalty for me to want to take > the risk of refactoring to avoid that. > > I've pushed it with some cosmetic adjustments.
Thank you, Tom. -- Peter Geoghegan
