On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 08:29:54AM +0200, Ronan Dunklau wrote: > Ok, do you want me to propose a different patch for previous versions ?
That's not necessary. Thanks for proposing. > Do you mean restart_lsn as the pointer argument to the function, or > restart_lsn as the field returned by the command ? If it's the first, I'll > change it but if it's the latter it is expected that we sometime run this on > a > slot where WAL has never been reserved yet. restart_lsn as the pointer of the function. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
