Tom Lane wrote: > Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I think number of index tuples makes sense, as long as that's what the > > costing needs. That is, it's up to the index AM to define it. But it > > clearly should not flap like this ... > > > And it's not just BRIN. This is what I get with a GIN index: > > Sounds like the same kind of thing we just fixed for SP-GiST :-(
Most likely I modelled the BRIN code after GIN. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
