Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I think number of index tuples makes sense, as long as that's what the > costing needs. That is, it's up to the index AM to define it. But it > clearly should not flap like this ...
> And it's not just BRIN. This is what I get with a GIN index:
Sounds like the same kind of thing we just fixed for SP-GiST :-(
regards, tom lane
