Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2/11/18 01:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. I was under the impression that Peter was looking into that ...
>> [ digs... ] see
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/80ee1f5c-fa9d-7285-ed07-cff53d4f4...@2ndquadrant.com
> Yeah that's still pending, but there wasn't a whole lot of reaction in
> that thread.
I think it's probably a good idea, but you hadn't finished the client
end of the patch. Since the main argument against doing this would
probably be about client-side breakage, we need to see how big that
impact will be before we make a final decision.
regards, tom lane
