On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:33:41PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > I noticed that the documentation for encrypt()/decrypt() says "aes — > AES (Rijndael-128)", but in fact 192 and 256 bit keys are also > supported, whether you build --with-openssl or --without-openssl. > Should that say "AES (Rijndael-128, -192 or -256)" instead?
Indeed. Instead of using the keysize as a prefix, I would personally find less confusing if written as "AES (Rijndael with key sizes of 128, 192 or 256 bytes)" instead of the phrasing you are proposing. Well, it is true that "Rijndael-128" and friends are wordings that can be found here and there.. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
