On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:22:05PM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > Michael said he'd do more review. I generally feel this is close, though.
Yep. I have provided the feedback I wanted for 0001 (no API change in the bloom facility by the way :( ), but I still wanted to look at 0002 in depths. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
