On Monday, January 22, 2018, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
> > In the end, I feel like this patch has actually been through the ringer > and back because it was brought up in the context of solving a problem > that we'd all like to fix in a better way. Had it been simply dropped > on us as a "I'd like to not have comments in my pg_dump output and > here's a patch to allow me to do that" I suspect it would have been > committed without anywhere near this level of effort. > +0; but recognizing our users are going to remain annoyed by the existing problem and that telling them that this is the answer will not sit well. David J.
