Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Well, I'm a little stumped. When I do it the way you did it, it fails
> with the same error you got:
> contrib_regression=# EXPLAIN (VERBOSE, COSTS OFF)
> SELECT * FROM ft1, ft2, ft4, ft5 WHERE ft1.c1 = ft2.c1 AND ft1.c1 = ft4.c1
> AND ft1.c1 = ft5.c1 FOR UPDATE;
> ERROR: outer pathkeys do not match mergeclauses
> But when I add the same command to postgres_fdw.sql and run it as part
> of the regression tests, it works. I tried adding it at the end with
> \c beforehand so that there wouldn't be any temporary settings in
> effect.
I duplicated those results, and then added an ANALYZE, and then it fails:
***************
*** 7548,7550 ****
--- 7595,7604 ----
(4 rows)
RESET enable_partition_wise_join;
+ \c -
+ analyze "S 1"."T 1";
+ -- multi-way join involving multiple merge joins
+ EXPLAIN (VERBOSE, COSTS OFF)
+ SELECT * FROM ft1, ft2, ft4, ft5 WHERE ft1.c1 = ft2.c1 AND ft1.c1 = ft4.c1
+ AND ft1.c1 = ft5.c1 FOR UPDATE;
+ ERROR: outer pathkeys do not match mergeclauses
So apparently the reason our manual tests replicated the failure is
that an auto-analyze happened in between. Now that I realize that,
I find that the manual query doesn't fail if executed *immediately*
after the regression test run. Wait a minute, repeat, it does fail.
OTOH, put the same ANALYZE before the test case where it is in the
script, no change.
So the contributing factors here are (1) there are a bunch of data
changes to "S 1"."T 1" further down in the script than where you
added the test case, and (2) you need an auto-analyze to have seen
those changes before the problematic plan gets picked.
It looks like Etsuro-san's proposed patch locks down the choice of
plan more tightly, which is probably a reasonable answer.
regards, tom lane
