(2018/01/31 4:56), Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>  wrote:
It looks like Etsuro-san's proposed patch locks down the choice of
plan more tightly, which is probably a reasonable answer.

OK, committed.  I added a comment along the lines you suggested
previously, since this no longer seems like a generic test that
happens to involve a bunch of merge joins.

Thank you!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

Reply via email to