On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Indeed, it looks like no other caller is paying attention to the result. > We could live with the uncertainty in the back branches, and redefine > ConditionVariableSignal as returning void in master.
+1 Could we install the sentinel and pop the first entry at the same time, so that we're not adding an extra spinlock acquire/release? -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
