I think deleting the TODO list is a bad idea -- it contains very useful
pointers to previous discussion on hard topics.
Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It also has a note at the top saying we think it's complete, but we
> > don't think that, or I don't think it anyway.
>
> Yeah, I don't care for that, either.
This text was added by [1] as saying:
> This list contains '''some known PostgreSQL bugs and feature
> requests''' and we hope it contains all such
(before this, it said "all known Pg bugs" which seemed too optimistic,
so the correction was in a good direction) and later amended by [2] to
the current wording ("This list contains '''known PostgreSQL bugs and
feature requests''' and we hope it is complete"). I think [1]'s wording
was okay, but the other one not so much.
I rewrote the text. I thought about presenting my draft here first, but
hey, it's a wiki.
[1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Todo&diff=17840&oldid=17669
[2] https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Todo&diff=17961&oldid=17877
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
