On 2 January 2018 at 17:52, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 12/31/17 22:43, Craig Ringer wrote: >> I'd rather rename it the "stuck, hard and abandoned projects list" ;) > > That might actually be useful.
Yep, agreed. Though it might do better to describe it in *slightly* more positive terms, and/or to explain the matter in a bit more detail... "TODO notes... This page has collected together a variety of proposed projects to enhance PostgreSQL. Newcomers should beware; the fact that these proposals have not been implemented should be taken to indicate that they represent approaches that are difficult, have gotten stuck, or even that have been abandoned due to having drawbacks exceeding the imagined advantages. Be sure to discuss proposals on the pgsql-hackers list before getting too far into implementation, otherwise there is considerable risk of wasting effort on a patch that is likely to be rejected." -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
