On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> Why not fixing that? Reproducible builds are a trend of these days, >> and what's proposed here is really simple to make PG more compliant >> with this purpose in mind. > > It's not like $0 instead of a hardcoded name in the header actually buys > us anything afaict.
+1. I think that reproducible builds are a worthwhile goal, and I welcome Christoph's continued work on them. -- Peter Geoghegan
