Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:34:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't really have an opinion about the relative merits of these changes,
>> but why do anything? The existing solution has the buildfarm happy, and
>> we've not heard any field complaints that I saw. I'm not sure we should
>> spend more time on supporting obsolete toolchain combinations that aren't
>> represented in the buildfarm.
> It's the other way around. The buildfarm's 32-bit MSVC animals each use an
> obsolete Perl. PostgreSQL is incompatible with today's 32-bit ActivePerl and
> Strawberry Perl.
Oh, OK. In that case, we need to get some representatives of these
more modern builds into the buildfarm while we're at it.
regards, tom lane
