Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes:
> I wonder if, years from now, it might look a bit odd that
> rewriteTargetListUD() is doing part of work of preptlist.c, is only
> called from there, and yet is located in the rewriter.
Yeah, I probably wouldn't have done it like this in a green field,
but maintaining traceability to the existing code is valuable IMO.
> A separate point -- it might be marginally more efficient to have the
> work of rewriteTargetListUD() done after expand_targetlist() to avoid
> the possible renumbering of the resjunk entries.
Hm. It wouldn't save a lot, but yeah, doing it in this order seems
a bit silly when you put it like that.
regards, tom lane
