Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> or just >> ... latency limit: 33/33 (100.000 %)
> Oh, yeah. That last one sounds good; no reason to print the same > value more than once. Sold; I'll go make it so. regards, tom lane