Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> or just
>> ... latency limit: 33/33 (100.000 %)

> Oh, yeah.  That last one sounds good; no reason to print the same
> value more than once.

Sold; I'll go make it so.

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to