On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I dunno, it just looks odd to me that when we've set up a test case in > which every one of the transactions is guaranteed to exceed the latency > limit, that it doesn't say that they all did. I don't particularly buy > your assumption that the percentages should sum. Anybody else have an > opinion there?
I agree with you, but I don't think either approach is free from possible confusion. I think it would help to show the numerator and the denominator explicitly, e.g.: number of clients: 1 number of threads: 1 number of transactions per client: 100 number of transactions actually processed: 33/100 number of transactions skipped: 67 (67.000 %) number of transactions above the 1.0 ms latency limit: 33 (33 of 33, 100.000 %) (My proposed change is in the last line.) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
