Hello, At Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:24:08 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in <20171117.132408.85564852.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > > Well, even the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() can be called unconditionally yes. > > It just seems like it's needless call as we'll call both in for loop > > anyway if we take the "slow" path. I admit it's not exactly big win > > though. If you think it would improve readability I can move it. > > I think this is the last message in this thread so I changed the > status of the CF entry to "Waiting for Author".
Hmm. Somehow the last patch and Robert's comment * which is the base of the patch * has been reached me in reverse order. I found that the patch is the latest one and will look this soon. Sorry for the ignorance. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
