On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Jeevan Chalke > <jeevan.cha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Yep. > > But as David reported earlier, if we remove the first part i.e. adding > > cpu_operator_cost per tuple, Merge Append will be preferred over an > Append > > node unlike before. And thus, I thought of better having both, but no so > > sure. Should we remove that part altogether, or add both in a single > > statement with updated comments? > > I was only suggesting that you update the comments. > OK. Done in the attached patch set. I have rebased all my patches on latest HEAD which is at 7518049980be1d90264addab003476ae105f70d4 Thanks > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > -- Jeevan Chalke Technical Architect, Product Development EnterpriseDB Corporation The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
partition-wise-agg-v7.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
