On 6/18/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah funny how you didn't do that ;) (of course neither did I).
I agree, an oops on my part :)
It is amazing how completely misguided you are in this response. I haven't said anything closed minded. I only responded to your rather antagonistic response to a reasonably innocuous question of: "As a cynic, I might ask, what Oracle is fearing? "
I wasn't responding to you, just to the seemingly closed-mindedness of the original question/statement. We're all aware of the reasons, for and against, proprietary system licenses prohibiting benchmarking.
It is a good question to ask, and a good question to discuss.
Certainly, but can one expect to get a realistic answer to an, "is Oracle fearing something" question on he PostgreSQL list? Or was it just a backhanded attempt at pushing the topic again? My vote is for the latter; it served no purpose other than to push the competitiveness topic again.
I haven't seen any bashing going on yet. Shall we start with the closed mindedness and unfairness of per cpu license and support models?
Not preferably, you make me type too much :) -- Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org/
