Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a better way to guarantee that there will be no gaps in my sequence > if something goes wrong with my transaction?
>From the overwhelming feedback I assume there isn't a better way yet... Thanks. I'll see how I can improve the model then to separate these sequences into different tables. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
