[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Gary L. Burnore") wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> At 03:44 PM 11/23/2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>>Did you warn the proponent of comp.databases.postgresql.* that you
>>>were going to do this? Did you read any of the arguments for and
>>>against a completely separate hierarchy that were posted to the RFD
>>>thread in news.groups?
>>
>>Interesting point. What did come of all the arguments? These news
>>server changes seem to be fairly arbitrary and one lined. Perhaps this
>>should be taken up as a whole?
>
> Setting this up outside of the comp. groups tells everyone you want to
> be more like microsoft.* and less like major databases. Moreover, it
> means less propagation since not all servers will carry them.
And if he plans on having *2* newsgroups for each list (one in comp.* and
one in pgsql.*) then the credibility of his hierarchy will go further down
the drain.
> So much for working out the problems.
No further comment.
--
Bill
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
