Thomas Hallgren wrote: > Marc, > > Since I (and I don't believe anyone else on core) uses Java ... > > shouldn't it be up to the developer of the PL/J* modules to do this? We > > can't weigh which one is better then the other, as we don't use it ... > > > Of course the contributors should supply as much of this material as > possible. The point I'm trying to make is that there's often no > incentive to do so, nor a good place to put it.
What incentive do you want us to give? We don't have any. And if someone does it, we will find a place for it. > > Also, how does someone support something that they don't use? Again, > > that is the developer of PL/J*'s job to do, not ours ... > > > Again, I'm not trying to offload work from the contributors onto the > members of core. This is about how things are perceived by the > PostgreSQL customers. Of course the contributors must continue to > support their products. If they don't, I'd expect the "supported" status > to be dropped at some point. I think you want us to look more like a MySQL AB or Oracle company where things are more bundled and blessed. It isn't going to happen with us because we aren't a company, don't make money, and don't control anyone. This reminds me of the MySQL migration guy who didn't want to use a 3rd party replicaiton solution. I really wanted to say he might be happier with MySQL. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
