Are there any suggestions on how to do incremental backups of the images and any other suggestions on performance? In the future I'd like to move some filesystem images to postgres to have a centralized storage. It would make some things easier, but i'm not sure it's worth the additional problems. Hopefully i'm imagining the problems.
--brian
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 08:56 PM, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
For the education of me and maybe others too, why was that? i.e. what problems did you run into, that bytea avoids?
Compared to the filesystem, bytea provides data integrity.
Bytea gives you remote access, which you can cache if needed.
Bytea gives you the same permissions as anything else in Postgres, so you
don't have to worry about that separately.
Compared to BLOBs, bytea's are just simpler. You can select them with a
single statement, you don't have to worry about leaving unreferenced
BLOBs, and, after 4 billion inserts, byteas are still meaningful while
BLOBs might not be. (due to OID problems).
Jon
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster