Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I assume that the datestyle has to be set to YMD for this to work as > > outlined above, right, and that 97-01-01 will throw an error unless the > > datestyle is YMD. > > Right, no more heuristics (other than assuming YYYY-MM-DD if the first > field is written with four digits). With 2-digit fields, the field > order will be taken to be whatever datestyle says it is.
Great. > > Yes, second one is most recent version. > > Thanks, I'll work from that. Great. Still working on the regression test failures. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
