Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:13:12PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 15:02, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Does anyone use YY-MM-DD for date input?  
> > > 
> > > Right now, it only works mostly for pre-2000 dates because we can detect
> > > that 97-02-03 is a year, while we can not detect that in 03-02-01.
> > > 
> > > We are considering eliminating it for 7.4.  You can still use
> > > yyyy-mm-dd, or course.
> > > 
> > > Comments?
> > 
> > What about the sliding window approach that some used to "solve"
> > the y2k problem: any year between, say '00' and '32' is presumed
> > to be in the 21st century, but years between '33' and '99' are
> > 20th century.
> > 
> > However, dropping it and letting the app deal with it is my non-
> > counting vote...
> 
> Mine too - as time goes by, we would also want to move the window
> 32][33 above etc, so simplest is if 03-02-01 would just be 3rd Feb
> 1AD, 2nd Mar 1AD or 1st Feb 3AD according to DMY, MDY or YMD. Still
> not clear to me how you make a difference between input and output
> encoding with a single DateStyle GUC variable.. DMY MDY and YMD
> just for input, US and European just for output?

We really can't do that because too many people are using a trailing YY
to mean current century, or most recent year with that suffix.  For
leading years, you have to specify it as 0001, rather than just 01.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to