Patrick Welche wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:13:12PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 15:02, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Does anyone use YY-MM-DD for date input? > > > > > > Right now, it only works mostly for pre-2000 dates because we can detect > > > that 97-02-03 is a year, while we can not detect that in 03-02-01. > > > > > > We are considering eliminating it for 7.4. You can still use > > > yyyy-mm-dd, or course. > > > > > > Comments? > > > > What about the sliding window approach that some used to "solve" > > the y2k problem: any year between, say '00' and '32' is presumed > > to be in the 21st century, but years between '33' and '99' are > > 20th century. > > > > However, dropping it and letting the app deal with it is my non- > > counting vote... > > Mine too - as time goes by, we would also want to move the window > 32][33 above etc, so simplest is if 03-02-01 would just be 3rd Feb > 1AD, 2nd Mar 1AD or 1st Feb 3AD according to DMY, MDY or YMD. Still > not clear to me how you make a difference between input and output > encoding with a single DateStyle GUC variable.. DMY MDY and YMD > just for input, US and European just for output?
We really can't do that because too many people are using a trailing YY to mean current century, or most recent year with that suffix. For leading years, you have to specify it as 0001, rather than just 01. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly