On 06/09/2017 08:56 AM, Ken Tanzer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Joe Conway wrote: > See set_user for a possible solution: https://github.com/pgaudit/ > > Thanks! Looking at the README, it seems like the intended use case is > the opposite (escalating privileges), but if I understand could work anyway?
It currently supports both use-cases (but not both simultaneously very
well). For your use you can do (from the README):
---
Block switching to a superuser role
set_user.block_superuser = on
---
> If I'm understanding, you could set_user() with a random token and
> thereby prevent switching back?
Exactly -- in order to switch back the same token would be needed. So
assuming you are using persistent connections (connection pooler, etc.)
you would start a new user session by calling set_user() with a token,
and then reset when done with the same token. Or since "done" may not be
something the app can really know, you might end up doing a preemptive
reset using the token and then then set_user().
> The extra logging would be undesirable. Is there any way to skip that
> entirely? I see with block_log_statement I could dial down the logging
> after switching users, but that would require the app to be aware of
> what the current "normal" logging level was.
Also from the README:
---
Notes:
If set_user.block_log_statement is set to "off", the log_statement
setting is left unchanged.
---
So assuming you do not normally have statements being logged, this would
not change that.
> Any other pitfalls I'm not seeing, or reasons this might be a bad idea?
As noted in the README, set_user will refuse to run inside a transaction
block, but other than that none that I know of. Of course if you come up
with any I'd be very interested to hear about them.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
